the signed/unsigned change seems to have caused a logic bug on some
[rsync/rsync.git] / TODO
CommitLineData
46ef7d1d 1-*- indented-text -*-
a0365806 2
46ef7d1d
MP
3URGENT ---------------------------------------------------------------
4
33d213bb
MP
5
6IMPORTANT ------------------------------------------------------------
7
8Cross-test versions
9
10 Part of the regression suite should be making sure that we don't
11 break backwards compatibility: old clients vs new servers and so
12 on. Ideally we would test the cross product of versions.
13
14 It might be sufficient to test downloads from well-known public
15 rsync servers running different versions of rsync. This will give
16 some testing and also be the most common case for having different
17 versions and not being able to upgrade.
18
a2d2e5c0
MP
19use chroot
20
21 If the platform doesn't support it, then don't even try.
22
23 If running as non-root, then don't fail, just give a warning.
24 (There was a thread about this a while ago?)
25
26 http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-August/thread.html
27 http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-September/thread.html
28
29--files-from
30
31 Avoids traversal. Better option than a pile of --include statements
32 for people who want to generate the file list using a find(1)
33 command or a script.
34
8f4455f2
MP
35File list structure in memory
36
37 Rather than one big array, perhaps have a tree in memory mirroring
38 the directory tree.
39
40 This might make sorting much faster! (I'm not sure it's a big CPU
41 problem, mind you.)
42
43 It might also reduce memory use in storing repeated directory names
44 -- again I'm not sure this is a problem.
0e5a1f83 45
a2d2e5c0
MP
46Performance
47
48 Traverse just one directory at a time. Tridge says it's possible.
a6a3c3df
MP
49
50 At the moment rsync reads the whole file list into memory at the
51 start, which makes us use a lot of memory and also not pipeline
52 network access as much as we could.
53
0e5a1f83
MP
54
55Handling duplicate names
56
b3e6c815 57 We need to be careful of duplicate names getting into the file list.
d2e9d069
MP
58 See clean_flist(). This could happen if multiple arguments include
59 the same file. Bad.
b3e6c815
MP
60
61 I think duplicates are only a problem if they're both flowing
62 through the pipeline at the same time. For example we might have
63 updated the first occurrence after reading the checksums for the
64 second. So possibly we just need to make sure that we don't have
65 both in the pipeline at the same time.
66
67 Possibly if we did one directory at a time that would be sufficient.
68
69 Alternatively we could pre-process the arguments to make sure no
58379559
MP
70 duplicates will ever be inserted. There could be some bad cases
71 when we're collapsing symlinks.
b3e6c815
MP
72
73 We could have a hash table.
74
d2e9d069
MP
75 The root of the problem is that we do not want more than one file
76 list entry referring to the same file. At first glance there are
77 several ways this could happen: symlinks, hardlinks, and repeated
78 names on the command line.
79
80 If names are repeated on the command line, they may be present in
81 different forms, perhaps by traversing directory paths in different
82 ways, traversing paths including symlinks. Also we need to allow
83 for expansion of globs by rsync.
84
85 At the moment, clean_flist() requires having the entire file list in
86 memory. Duplicate names are detected just by a string comparison.
87
88 We don't need to worry about hard links causing duplicates because
89 files are never updated in place. Similarly for symlinks.
90
91 I think even if we're using a different symlink mode we don't need
92 to worry.
93
0e5a1f83
MP
94 Unless we're really clever this will introduce a protocol
95 incompatibility, so we need to be able to accept the old format as
96 well.
97
98
a6a3c3df
MP
99Memory accounting
100
101 At exit, show how much memory was used for the file list, etc.
102
b3e6c815
MP
103 Also we do a wierd exponential-growth allocation in flist.c. I'm
104 not sure this makes sense with modern mallocs. At any rate it will
105 make us allocate a huge amount of memory for large file lists.
106
0e5a1f83 107
a6a3c3df
MP
108Hard-link handling
109
110 At the moment hardlink handling is very expensive, so it's off by
111 default. It does not need to be so.
112
0e5a1f83
MP
113 Since most of the solutions are rather intertwined with the file
114 list it is probably better to fix that first, although fixing
115 hardlinks is possibly simpler.
116
a6a3c3df
MP
117 We can rule out hardlinked directories since they will probably
118 screw us up in all kinds of ways. They simply should not be used.
119
120 At the moment rsync only cares about hardlinks to regular files. I
121 guess you could also use them for sockets, devices and other beasts,
122 but I have not seen them.
123
124 When trying to reproduce hard links, we only need to worry about
125 files that have more than one name (nlinks>1 && !S_ISDIR).
126
127 The basic point of this is to discover alternate names that refer to
128 the same file. All operations, including creating the file and
129 writing modifications to it need only to be done for the first name.
130 For all later names, we just create the link and then leave it
131 alone.
132
133 If hard links are to be preserved:
134
135 Before the generator/receiver fork, the list of files is received
136 from the sender (recv_file_list), and a table for detecting hard
137 links is built.
138
139 The generator looks for hard links within the file list and does
140 not send checksums for them, though it does send other metadata.
141
142 The sender sends the device number and inode with file entries, so
143 that files are uniquely identified.
144
145 The receiver goes through and creates hard links (do_hard_links)
146 after all data has been written, but before directory permissions
147 are set.
148
149 At the moment device and inum are sent as 4-byte integers, which
150 will probably cause problems on large filesystems. On Linux the
151 kernel uses 64-bit ino_t's internally, and people will soon have
152 filesystems big enough to use them. We ought to follow NFS4 in
153 using 64-bit device and inode identification, perhaps with a
154 protocol version bump.
155
156 Once we've seen all the names for a particular file, we no longer
157 need to think about it and we can deallocate the memory.
158
159 We can also have the case where there are links to a file that are
160 not in the tree being transferred. There's nothing we can do about
161 that. Because we rename the destination into place after writing,
162 any hardlinks to the old file are always going to be orphaned. In
163 fact that is almost necessary because otherwise we'd get really
164 confused if we were generating checksums for one name of a file and
165 modifying another.
166
167 At the moment the code seems to make a whole second copy of the file
168 list, which seems unnecessary.
169
170 We should have a test case that exercises hard links. Since it
171 might be hard to compare ./tls output where the inodes change we
172 might need a little program to check whether several names refer to
173 the same file.
a2d2e5c0
MP
174
175IPv6
176
c33e3e39
MP
177 Implement suggestions from http://www.kame.net/newsletter/19980604/
178 and ftp://ftp.iij.ad.jp/pub/RFC/rfc2553.txt
179
180 If a host has multiple addresses, then listen try to connect to all
181 in order until we get through. (getaddrinfo may return multiple
c10b0bdd 182 addresses.) This is kind of implemented already.
c33e3e39
MP
183
184 Possibly also when starting as a server we may need to listen on
185 multiple passive addresses. This might be a bit harder, because we
186 may need to select on all of them. Hm.
187
a2d2e5c0
MP
188 Define a syntax for IPv6 literal addresses. Since they include
189 colons, they tend to break most naming systems, including ours.
190 Based on the HTTP IPv6 syntax, I think we should use
191
192 rsync://[::1]/foo/bar
193 [::1]::bar
194
195 which should just take a small change to the parser code.
196
5aafd07b
MP
197Errors
198
199 If we hang or get SIGINT, then explain where we were up to. Perhaps
200 have a static buffer that contains the current function name, or
201 some kind of description of what we were trying to do. This is a
202 little easier on people than needing to run strace/truss.
203
204 "The dungeon collapses! You are killed." Rather than "unexpected
205 eof" give a message that is more detailed if possible and also more
206 helpful.
207
5575de14
MP
208File attributes
209
210 Device major/minor numbers should be at least 32 bits each. See
211 http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-November/005357.html
212
213 Transfer ACLs. Need to think of a standard representation.
214 Probably better not to even try to convert between NT and POSIX.
215 Possibly can share some code with Samba.
5aafd07b 216
28a69e25
MP
217Empty directories
218
219 With the current common --include '*/' --exclude '*' pattern, people
220 can end up with many empty directories. We might avoid this by
221 lazily creating such directories.
222
223zlib
224
225 Perhaps don't use our own zlib. Will we actually be incompatible,
226 or just be slightly less efficient?
227
228logging
229
230 Perhaps flush stdout after each filename, so that people trying to
231 monitor progress in a log file can do so more easily. See
232 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=48108
233
430d841a
MP
234 At the connections that just get a list of modules are not logged,
235 but they should be.
236
7c583c73
MP
237rsyncd over ssh
238
239 There are already some patches to do this.
240
92325ada
MP
241proxy authentication
242
243 Allow RSYNC_PROXY to be http://user:pass@proxy.foo:3128/, and do
244 HTTP Basic Proxy-Authentication.
245
246 Multiple schemes are possible, up to and including the insanity that
247 is NTLM, but Basic probably covers most cases.
248
249SOCKS
250
251 Add --with-socks, and then perhaps a command-line option to put them
252 on or off. This might be more reliable than LD_PRELOAD hacks.
253
a2d2e5c0
MP
254PLATFORMS ------------------------------------------------------------
255
256Win32
257
258 Don't detach, because this messes up --srvany.
259
260 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00234.html
261
262 According to "Effective TCP/IP Programming" (??) close() on a socket
263 has incorrect behaviour on Windows -- it sends a RST packet to the
264 other side, which gives a "connection reset by peer" error. On that
265 platform we should probably do shutdown() instead. However, on Unix
266 we are correct to call close(), because shutdown() discards
267 untransmitted data.
268
7c583c73
MP
269DOCUMENTATION --------------------------------------------------------
270
271Update README
272
a2d2e5c0
MP
273BUILD FARM -----------------------------------------------------------
274
275Add machines
276
277 AMDAHL UTS (Dave Dykstra)
278
279 Cygwin (on different versions of Win32?)
280
281 HP-UX variants (via HP?)
33d213bb 282
5aafd07b
MP
283 SCO
284
46ef7d1d
MP
285NICE -----------------------------------------------------------------
286
a2d2e5c0
MP
287--no-detach and --no-fork options
288
289 Very useful for debugging. Also good when running under a
290 daemon-monitoring process that tries to restart the service when the
291 parent exits.
292
293hang/timeout friendliness
294
50f2f002
MP
295verbose output
296
297 Indicate whether files are new, updated, or deleted
298
a2d2e5c0
MP
299internationalization
300
301 Change to using gettext(). Probably need to ship this for platforms
302 that don't have it.
303
304 Solicit translations.
305
306 Does anyone care?
307
46ef7d1d
MP
308rsyncsh
309
310 Write a small emulation of interactive ftp as a Pythonn program
311 that calls rsync. Commands such as "cd", "ls", "ls *.c" etc map
312 fairly directly into rsync commands: it just needs to remember the
313 current host, directory and so on. We can probably even do
314 completion of remote filenames.
315
b3e6c815 316%K%