--- /dev/null
+This patch makes the processing of large really large files more efficient
+by making sure that the sender's hash table is large enough to hold all the
+checksum entries without being overloaded. It also makes the hasing of
+normal sized files use slightly less memory than before.
+
+http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-March/011875.html
+
+--- old/match.c
++++ new/match.c
+@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@ extern int append_mode;
+
+ int updating_basis_file;
+
+-typedef unsigned short tag;
+-
+-#define TABLESIZE (1<<16)
+-#define NULL_TAG (-1)
+-
+ static int false_alarms;
+ static int tag_hits;
+ static int matches;
+@@ -42,47 +37,36 @@ static int total_matches;
+
+ extern struct stats stats;
+
+-struct target {
+- tag t;
+- int32 i;
+-};
+-
+-static struct target *targets;
+-
+-static int32 *tag_table;
+-
+-#define gettag2(s1,s2) (((s1) + (s2)) & 0xFFFF)
+-#define gettag(sum) gettag2((sum)&0xFFFF,(sum)>>16)
+-
+-static int compare_targets(struct target *t1,struct target *t2)
+-{
+- return (int)t1->t - (int)t2->t;
+-}
++static int32 tablesize, tablealloc;
++static int32 *sum_table;
+
++#define gettag2(s1,s2) gettag((s1) + ((s2)<<16))
++#define gettag(sum) ((sum)%tablesize)
+
+ static void build_hash_table(struct sum_struct *s)
+ {
+- int32 i;
++ int32 i, t;
+
+- if (!tag_table)
+- tag_table = new_array(int32, TABLESIZE);
++ /* Dynamically calculate the hash table size so that the hash load
++ * is always about 80%. This number must be odd or s2 will not be
++ * able to span the entire set. */
++ tablesize = (s->count/8) * 10 + 11;
++ if (tablesize < 65537)
++ tablesize = 65537; /* a prime number */
++ if (tablesize > tablealloc) {
++ tablealloc = tablesize;
++ sum_table = realloc_array(sum_table, int32, tablealloc);
++ if (!sum_table)
++ out_of_memory("build_hash_table");
++ }
+
+- targets = new_array(struct target, s->count);
+- if (!tag_table || !targets)
+- out_of_memory("build_hash_table");
++ memset(sum_table, 0xFF, tablesize * sizeof (int32));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < s->count; i++) {
+- targets[i].i = i;
+- targets[i].t = gettag(s->sums[i].sum1);
++ t = gettag(s->sums[i].sum1);
++ s->sums[i].chain = sum_table[t];
++ sum_table[t] = i;
+ }
+-
+- qsort(targets,s->count,sizeof(targets[0]),(int (*)())compare_targets);
+-
+- for (i = 0; i < TABLESIZE; i++)
+- tag_table[i] = NULL_TAG;
+-
+- for (i = s->count; i-- > 0; )
+- tag_table[targets[i].t] = i;
+ }
+
+
+@@ -176,20 +160,16 @@ static void hash_search(int f,struct sum
+ }
+
+ do {
+- tag t = gettag2(s1,s2);
++ int32 i, t = gettag2(s1,s2);
+ int done_csum2 = 0;
+- int32 j = tag_table[t];
+
+ if (verbose > 4)
+ rprintf(FINFO,"offset=%.0f sum=%08x\n",(double)offset,sum);
+
+- if (j == NULL_TAG)
+- goto null_tag;
+-
+ sum = (s1 & 0xffff) | (s2 << 16);
+ tag_hits++;
+- do {
+- int32 l, i = targets[j].i;
++ for (i = sum_table[t]; i >= 0; i = s->sums[i].chain) {
++ int32 l;
+
+ if (sum != s->sums[i].sum1)
+ continue;
+@@ -205,9 +185,10 @@ static void hash_search(int f,struct sum
+ && !(s->sums[i].flags & SUMFLG_SAME_OFFSET))
+ continue;
+
+- if (verbose > 3)
+- rprintf(FINFO,"potential match at %.0f target=%.0f %.0f sum=%08x\n",
+- (double)offset,(double)j,(double)i,sum);
++ if (verbose > 3) {
++ rprintf(FINFO,"potential match at %.0f i=%ld sum=%08x\n",
++ (double)offset, (long)i, sum);
++ }
+
+ if (!done_csum2) {
+ map = (schar *)map_ptr(buf,offset,l);
+@@ -224,23 +205,23 @@ static void hash_search(int f,struct sum
+ * one with an identical offset, so we prefer that over
+ * the following want_i optimization. */
+ if (updating_basis_file) {
+- do {
+- int32 i2 = targets[j].i;
++ int32 i2;
++ for (i2 = i; i2 >= 0; i2 = s->sums[i2].chain) {
+ if (s->sums[i2].offset != offset)
+ continue;
+ if (i2 != i) {
+ if (sum != s->sums[i2].sum1)
+- break;
++ continue;
+ if (memcmp(sum2, s->sums[i2].sum2,
+ s->s2length) != 0)
+- break;
++ continue;
+ i = i2;
+ }
+ /* This chunk was at the same offset on
+ * both the sender and the receiver. */
+ s->sums[i].flags |= SUMFLG_SAME_OFFSET;
+ goto set_want_i;
+- } while (++j < s->count && targets[j].t == t);
++ }
+ }
+
+ /* we've found a match, but now check to see
+@@ -266,9 +247,8 @@ static void hash_search(int f,struct sum
+ s2 = sum >> 16;
+ matches++;
+ break;
+- } while (++j < s->count && targets[j].t == t);
++ }
+
+- null_tag:
+ backup = offset - last_match;
+ /* We sometimes read 1 byte prior to last_match... */
+ if (backup < 0)
+@@ -375,11 +355,6 @@ void match_sums(int f, struct sum_struct
+ rprintf(FINFO,"sending file_sum\n");
+ write_buf(f,file_sum,MD4_SUM_LENGTH);
+
+- if (targets) {
+- free(targets);
+- targets=NULL;
+- }
+-
+ if (verbose > 2)
+ rprintf(FINFO, "false_alarms=%d tag_hits=%d matches=%d\n",
+ false_alarms, tag_hits, matches);
+--- old/rsync.h
++++ new/rsync.h
+@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ struct sum_buf {
+ OFF_T offset; /**< offset in file of this chunk */
+ int32 len; /**< length of chunk of file */
+ uint32 sum1; /**< simple checksum */
++ int32 chain; /**< hash-table chaining */
+ short flags; /**< flag bits */
+ char sum2[SUM_LENGTH]; /**< checksum */
+ };
+--- old/sender.c
++++ new/sender.c
+@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static struct sum_struct *receive_sums(i
+
+ s->sums[i].offset = offset;
+ s->sums[i].flags = 0;
++ s->sums[i].chain = 0;
+
+ if (i == s->count-1 && s->remainder != 0)
+ s->sums[i].len = s->remainder;