- We don't need to ignore local rules in send_file_name() anymore
authorWayne Davison <wayned@samba.org>
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:25:54 +0000 (19:25 +0000)
committerWayne Davison <wayned@samba.org>
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:25:54 +0000 (19:25 +0000)
commit3d5df06de184081137718874fa1cba9e72bd52c0
tree62466bdd32b21674c1340eed72a36b3fec849445
parent27a7053cbe08bdce668f7fe62e53b06fbb6d4cb9
- We don't need to ignore local rules in send_file_name() anymore
  when --delete-excluded was specified because the local filter
  list has already been pruned of any rules that don't apply on
  the receiver.  This simplification removes the need for the code
  that set delete_excluded to 2 for protocol_version >= 29.
- Improved the code in get_rule_prefix() to always supply the full
  list of prefixes for protocol_version >= 29.
- Don't ever avoid a get_rule_prefix() when trimming the filter list
  without sending it because it is the function that tells us if a
  rule is too modern for the other side to deal with (e.g. if we
  couldn't send the protect rules to the receiver).
sender-receiver-excludes.diff