- -W, --whole-file copy whole files, no incremental checks
-@@ -614,6 +615,10 @@ modified cannot be effective; in other w
- cause the next transfer to behave as if it used -I, and all files will have
- their checksums compared and show up in log messages even if they haven\&'t
- changed\&.
-+.IP
-+.IP "\fB--chmod\fP"
-+This options tells rsync to apply the listed "chmod" pattern
-+to the permission of the files on the destination\&.
- .IP
- .IP "\fB-n, --dry-run\fP"
- This tells rsync to not do any file transfers,
---- rsync.yo 2 Feb 2004 18:23:09 -0000 1.147
-+++ rsync.yo 10 Mar 2004 08:01:00 -0000
-@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ verb(
- -g, --group preserve group
- -D, --devices preserve devices (root only)
- -t, --times preserve times
-+ --chmod=CHMOD change destination permissions
- -S, --sparse handle sparse files efficiently
- -n, --dry-run show what would have been transferred
- -W, --whole-file copy whole files, no incremental checks
-@@ -534,6 +535,9 @@ modified cannot be effective; in other w
- cause the next transfer to behave as if it used -I, and all files will have
- their checksums compared and show up in log messages even if they haven't
- changed.
-+
-+dit(bf(--chmod)) This options tells rsync to apply the listed "chmod" pattern
-+to the permission of the files on the destination.
+ -W, --whole-file copy files whole (without rsync algorithm)
+@@ -644,6 +645,14 @@ dit(bf(-O, --omit-dir-times)) This tells
+ it is preserving modification times (see bf(--times)). If NFS is sharing
+ the directories on the receiving side, it is a good idea to use bf(-O).