- More evaluation.

[match/match.git] / program / PMInstanceGenerator.hs

diff --git a/program/PMInstanceGenerator.hs b/program/PMInstanceGenerator.hs
index 1143f61..97a546a 100644 (file)
--- a/program/PMInstanceGenerator.hs
+++ b/program/PMInstanceGenerator.hs
@@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ data ReviewerInfo = ReviewerInfo {
 }
 
 randomReviewerInfo numProps = do
+       -- "Older" reviewers are more likely to be expert on topics.
+       age <- mrandomR (0.5, 1.0)
        expns <- indRandomArray (0, numTopics-1) $
-               withProb [(0.15, return 2), (0.4, return 1)] (return 0)
+               withProb [(0.15 * age, return 2), (0.4 * age, return 1)] (return 0)
        -- Samir: "Its often the case that each reviewer has a COI with say
        -- one proposal submitted either by their University (different faculty)
        -- or by a recent co-author."