From b4fc3987f20e6af92aeb5e0c6ff80e3a70df3e87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:50:09 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Use the new NOBODY_USER and NOBODY_GROUP configure defines.

---
 loadparm.c | 13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/loadparm.c b/loadparm.c
index ae8a677f..bec5bc97 100644
--- a/loadparm.c
+++ b/loadparm.c
@@ -160,17 +160,8 @@ static service sDefault =
 	True,    /* use chroot */
 	False,   /* transfer logging */
 	False,   /* ignore errors */
-	"nobody",/* uid */
-
-	/* TODO: This causes problems on Debian, where it is called
-	 * "nogroup".  Debian patch this in their version of the
-	 * package, but it would be nice to be consistent.  Possibly
-	 * other systems are different again.
-	 *
-	 * What is the best behaviour?  Perhaps always using (gid_t)
-	 * -2? */
-	"nobody",/* gid */
-
+	NOBODY_USER,/* uid */
+	NOBODY_GROUP,/* gid */
 	NULL,    /* hosts allow */
 	NULL,    /* hosts deny */
 	NULL,    /* auth users */
-- 
2.34.1