From 87fcb63975824b48532b673fe3ebd5238424eb41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Pool <mbp@samba.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:08:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] No need to test for memcmp, because even broken ones are good
 enough for our purposes.  (Patch from Dave Dykstra.)

---
 configure.in | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 72f1ab41..2e011234 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -291,7 +291,11 @@ if test x"$ac_cv_func_strcasecmp" = x"no"; then
     AC_CHECK_LIB(resolv, strcasecmp)
 fi
 
-AC_FUNC_MEMCMP
+dnl At the moment we don't test for a broken memcmp(), because all we
+dnl need to do is test for equality, not comparison, and it seems that
+dnl every platform has a memcmp that can do at least that.  
+dnl AC_FUNC_MEMCMP
+
 AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL
 AC_CHECK_FUNCS(waitpid wait4 getcwd strdup strerror chown chmod mknod)
 AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fchmod fstat strchr readlink link utime utimes strftime)
-- 
2.34.1