From 51b2ff03b3f45b360b75109148cd0606621089bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wayne Davison Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:22:33 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Optimize --inplace chunck search to avoid a non-aligned search. --- match.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/match.c b/match.c index 611035f7..229c9dd6 100644 --- a/match.c +++ b/match.c @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static void matched(int f, struct sum_struct *s, struct map_struct *buf, static void hash_search(int f,struct sum_struct *s, struct map_struct *buf, OFF_T len) { - OFF_T offset, end; + OFF_T offset, aligned_offset, end; int32 k, want_i, backup; char sum2[SUM_LENGTH]; uint32 s1, s2, sum; @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void hash_search(int f,struct sum_struct *s, if (DEBUG_GTE(DELTASUM, 3)) rprintf(FINFO, "sum=%.8x k=%ld\n", sum, (long)k); - offset = 0; + offset = aligned_offset = 0; end = len + 1 - s->sums[s->count-1].len; @@ -233,24 +233,27 @@ static void hash_search(int f,struct sum_struct *s, /* When updating in-place, the best possible match is * one with an identical offset, so we prefer that over - * the following want_i optimization. */ + * the adjacent want_i optimization. */ if (updating_basis_file) { - int32 i2; - for (i2 = i; i2 >= 0; i2 = s->sums[i2].chain) { - if (s->sums[i2].offset != offset) - continue; - if (i2 != i) { - if (sum != s->sums[i2].sum1) - break; - if (memcmp(sum2, s->sums[i2].sum2, - s->s2length) != 0) - break; - i = i2; + /* All the sender's chunks start at blength boundaries. */ + while (aligned_offset < offset) + aligned_offset += s->blength; + if (offset == aligned_offset) { + int32 i2; + for (i2 = i; i2 >= 0; i2 = s->sums[i2].chain) { + if (s->sums[i2].offset != offset) + continue; + if (i2 != i) { + if (sum != s->sums[i2].sum1 + || memcmp(sum2, s->sums[i2].sum2, s->s2length) != 0) + break; + i = i2; + } + /* This chunk was at the same offset on + * both the sender and the receiver. */ + s->sums[i].flags |= SUMFLG_SAME_OFFSET; + want_i = i; } - /* This chunk was at the same offset on - * both the sender and the receiver. */ - s->sums[i].flags |= SUMFLG_SAME_OFFSET; - goto set_want_i; } } @@ -265,7 +268,6 @@ static void hash_search(int f,struct sum_struct *s, * will be happy */ i = want_i; } - set_want_i: want_i = i + 1; matched(f,s,buf,offset,i); -- 2.34.1