From: Martin Pool <mbp@samba.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:53:21 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Doc: Debian uses "nogroup" instead of group "nobody", so our defaults
X-Git-Url: https://mattmccutchen.net/rsync/rsync.git/commitdiff_plain/4366275bab47eb9904314c9284c63d95e0114906

Doc: Debian uses "nogroup" instead of group "nobody", so our defaults
are not so good.
---

diff --git a/loadparm.c b/loadparm.c
index f71a3bec..c7a0db59 100644
--- a/loadparm.c
+++ b/loadparm.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 /* some fixes
  *
- * Copyright (C) 2001 by Martin Pool <mbp@samba.org>
+ * Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 by Martin Pool <mbp@samba.org>
  */
 
 /* 
@@ -154,7 +154,16 @@ static service sDefault =
 	False,   /* transfer logging */
 	False,   /* ignore errors */
 	"nobody",/* uid */
+	
+	/* TODO: This causes problems on Debian, where it is called
+	 * "nogroup".  Debian patch this in their version of the
+	 * package, but it would be nice to be consistent.  Possibly
+	 * other systems are different again.
+	 *
+	 * What is the best behaviour?  Perhaps always using (gid_t)
+	 * -2? */
 	"nobody",/* gid */
+	
 	NULL,    /* hosts allow */
 	NULL,    /* hosts deny */
 	NULL,    /* auth users */