X-Git-Url: https://mattmccutchen.net/match/match.git/blobdiff_plain/56b2309d91ad118a6758b8e5d904b3ac4edc49ce..5d419061ba673a5658e0f7485f73babb72491852:/paper/paper.tex

diff --git a/paper/paper.tex b/paper/paper.tex
index 088ca17..a332681 100644
--- a/paper/paper.tex
+++ b/paper/paper.tex
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ Flow can pass from $s$ through one or more of the nodes $r^t_i$ and
 one or more of the nodes $p^t_j$ to the sink to represent a review
 by reviewer $i$ of paper $j$.
 
-Each paper has an edge of capacity $r$ to
-the sink, indicating that it needs $r$ reviews.  In general, these
+Each paper has an edge of capacity $q$ to
+the sink, indicating that it needs $q$ reviews.  In general, these
 edges will constitute the min cut, so any max flow will saturate them
 and thereby provide all the required reviews.  We take the min-cost
 max flow in order to provide the reviews in the ``best'' possible way.
@@ -204,8 +204,8 @@ unit-capacity edge of cost $-c_1$ from $p^1_j$ to $p^3_j$.
 In addition to the bonus edges,
 there are edges of zero cost and unlimited capacity that reviews can follow
 from $p^1_j$ to $p^2_j$ and from $p^2_j$ to $p^3_j$ in order to reach the sink.
-The choice to offer bonuses for two reviews was based on the value $r = 3$;
-this would be easy to change for other values of $r$.
+The choice to offer bonuses for two reviews was based on the value $q = 3$;
+this would be easy to change for other values of $q$.
 
 In the example in Figure~\ref{flow-fig},
 paper 1 is interesting to reviewer 1 and boring to reviewers 2 and 3.